Unsupported Browser
The American College of Surgeons website is not compatible with Internet Explorer 11, IE 11. For the best experience please update your browser.
Menu
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
ACS
Literature Selections

Geriatric Surgery Verification Hospitals Report Higher Delirium Screening Rates

June 16, 2026

acs-store-journalperiodical.jpg

Remer SL, Smolkin C, Rosenthal R, Ko CY, et al. Hospital Variation in Postoperative Delirium Screening and Outcomes in Older Adult Surgical Patients: A National Analysis of Geriatric and Non-Geriatric Surgery Verification Hospitals. J Am Coll Surg. June 2026.

Postoperative delirium in older surgical patients drives morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization, yet real-world implementation and impact of standardized screening within older adult-focused surgical programs remain undefined. The authors of this study sought to determine whether quality verification of geriatric surgery services affected delirium screening rates.

A retrospective cohort study using ACS NSQIP data (January–December 2024) included inpatients aged ≥75 years. Primary endpoints were postoperative delirium screening and screen positivity. Outcomes were compared between ACS Geriatric Surgery Verification (GSV) and non-GSV hospitals, with stratification by hospital-level screening frequency. Secondary endpoints included length of stay (LOS), prolonged LOS (top quartile), and 30-day readmissions.

Among 97,886 patients (mean age 81.7±5.3 years), 53.0% underwent delirium screening. Screening was higher at GSV hospitals (94.3% versus 52.5%). Overall delirium screen positivity was 12.5% and did not differ between GSV and non-GSV hospitals (11.3% versus 12.5%, p = 0.25), with similar delirium risk per 100 patient-days. Among screened patients, GSV hospitals demonstrated shorter LOS and fewer prolonged LOS. Among patients with positive delirium screenings, LOS, prolonged LOS, and 30-day readmissions were similar across hospital types.

GSV hospitals achieve substantially higher delirium screening without increased detection rates, suggesting observed variation reflects screening practices rather than true incidence. Shorter LOS among screened patients at GSV hospitals indicates that structured geriatric perioperative care processes may improve efficiency and outcomes independent of delirium occurrence, whereas outcomes converge once delirium develops.

Further Insights

The ACS also issued a press release highlighting these findings and additional perspectives from the study authors.

“A lot of delirium, especially in older adults, is hypoactive—it is the quiet form where a patient is withdrawn or lethargic. If you are not doing routine screening, these cases go undetected and can be mistaken for fatigue. Some hospitals may only be screening when a patient has hyperactive, very clinically obvious delirium, essentially using a screening tool to confirm a diagnosis rather than to get ahead of it,” said lead study author Sarah Remer, MD, MS, an ACS Clinical Scholar and a general surgery resident at Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, Illinois.