Unsupported Browser
The American College of Surgeons website is not compatible with Internet Explorer 11, IE 11. For the best experience please update your browser.
Menu
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
ACS
Case Study

How TQIP Benchmarking Assisted in and Highlighted a Decrease in CAUTls over One Year in Trauma Patients

Richmond University Medical Center

General Information

Institution Name: Richmond University Medical Center

Primary Author and Title: Akella Chendrasekhar, MD, FACS, Trauma Medical Director; Christopher Ruiz, RN, BSN, TCRN, Trauma Program Nursing Director; and Marisa Easop, EMT-B, Pl Coordinator

Name of Case Study: How TQIP Benchmarking Assisted in and Highlighted a Decrease in CAUTls over One Year in Trauma Patients

What Was Done?

Global Problem Addressed

Cather-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) are the most frequently occurring hospital-acquired infection (HAI) in the U.S. According to the CDC, CAUTls make up approximately 75 percent of all urinary tract infections that occur in hospitals. Also, with 15 to 25 percent of hospitalized patients receiving urinary catheters during their stay, there is a large potential for at-risk patients to contract an HAI. This is shown by the approximately 449,334 CAUTI events that are reported each year.

Identification of Local Problem

As highlighted by the fall 2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Risk-Adjusted Complications Report, we found Richmond University Medical Center (RUMC) to have an odds ratio of 6.84. When compared with all other trauma centers enrolled in TQIP, this made RUMC a high outlier for CAUTI complications. As an institution committed to quality patient care and outcomes, we were driven by this data and worked diligently to improve this complication.

How Was the Quality Improvement (QI) Activity Put in Place?

Context of the QI Activity

Richmond University Medical Center is a Level 1 adult and Level 2 pediatric ACS TQIP-verified trauma center with 448 licensed beds providing care to an urban/ suburban community in Staten Island, NY. The trauma service alone cares for approximately 1,500 adult and 200 pediatric patients per year. Last year, out of 1,751 adults and children evaluated by trauma, 1,194 were admitted.

For this project, there was no hospital-wide oversight. The motivation behind this project was to improve upon our patient management, which would be reflected in our TQIP scores. But by initiating this conversation, we were able to bring more attention and awareness to the situation at hand. Seeing the success of our nurse-driven policy, the hospital system adopted our practice to assist in the reduction of CAUTls throughout the institution. Further motivation has encouraged other departments and programs to work collaboratively with trauma and constructively think of other measures to put in place for further improvement of patient management.

Planning and Development Process

Based on the 2016 TQIP report, CAUTI was identified as an area of improvement. Once we settled on CAUTls, we constructed the nurse-driven Foley catheter protocol. The first unit educated on the new policy was the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). The nurses and nurse management staff on this unit were very open to the education and implementation. A discussion regarding all expected outcomes was had at the trauma committee meeting so that all stakeholders throughout the institution were on the same page. Once the staff was educated, we began daily rounding on all trauma patients in all units to see who fit the criteria for removal. After seeing the drastic reduction in CAUTls from the fall 2016 to spring 2017 report, more units bought in to the project, and we were able to train them as well. Currently, all units that intake trauma patients are trained on this policy.

The Nurse-Driven Foley Removal diagram was created by our trauma medical director and agreed upon among physicians within the hospital (Figure 1). This diagram is one of the crucial elements in this policy.

Description of the Quality Improvement Activity

Based on the benchmark findings in the TQIP report, it was evident that a performance improvement measure was needed. A Foley catheter management protocol was constructed to highlight the interventions implemented to manage this complication. Included in the policy is a CAUTI Reduction Bundle, Nurse­ Driven Foley Removal protocol, and daily rounding as a method to document and identify patients who no longer need Foleys. In addition, Foleys placed in the emergency department must be changed or exchanged within 24 hours of placement for traumatically injured patients. Also included in the protocol, the trauma and surgical team will utilized a Texas catheter in patients who fit the criteria. Daily morning rounds would be conducted on all trauma patients admitted to evaluate the care plan and see how to improve overall management and care. The education was provided by the trauma director and trauma team.

This policy was implemented on August 1, 2017.

how-tqip-benchmarking-case-study-figure-1.png

Resources Used and Skills Needed

Staff

The team to assist in the reduction in CAUTI rate included the trauma/ surgical residents, SICU staff, the nurse manager, physician assistants, nurses, medical students, and our trauma team.

Costs

The project did not require any additional funds to implement or maintain.

What Were the Results?

Since the implementation of the protocol on August 1, 2017, there has been a significant decrease of CAUTls in trauma patients. As initially identified by the fall 2016 TQIP report, our center was a high outlier with an odds ratio of 6.84. After much diligence and commitment to engaging the staff in this new protocol, we saw the number of CAUTls drop in the spring 2017 report to 3.37. Then, in the fall 2017 report, there was a staggering drop to 0.75 (Table 1).

how-tqip-benchmarking-case-study-table-1.png

Setbacks

No barriers to the implementation of this process were encountered.

In August of 2018, we revised the protocol to include SUTI Criterion 1a and 1b.

As the population of patients presenting to the trauma service are often elderly and from nursing homes, it quickly became apparent that they possibly came into the institution with a preexisting UTI. After consulting infection control, it was decided this SUTI rational for obtaining a urine culture should be included in the policy. Now if a patient presents with any of the symptoms listed, we are able to draw a culture and separate preexisting UTls from CAUTls.

Cost Savings

There were no additional costs associated with this project.

According to Hospital Safety Grade, each CAUTI costs an average institution an estimated $758 per patient. In the fall 2016 report, there were 20 patients with a diagnosed CAUTI. Using the estimate given, those 20 patients cost our institution approximately $14,960. When comparing the fall 2016 and fall 2017 reports, there was only one patient in the fall of 2017 with a reported CAUTI.

Using the same estimates, our hospital saved approximately $14,202 in one year by implementing this policy.

Tips for Others

  • Additional funds needed for this project were very low, as the supplies were already available and we did not need to obtain any new staff or equipment. In looking for best practices to back up our new standards, we had many discussions with other institutions to see what their success rates were and what principals they were using. This is an excellent way to see what is working in other institutions and if any of that success can be duplicated in your facility. We recently started a pilot of a new external female catheter after several of our colleagues from other institutions recommended them versus the ones we were using. In this pilot period, we also gave the nurses involved in the initiative a survey form in order to evaluate the feedback they have on the new product. This allows us to get information on the ease of use of the product as well as any potential flaws. When nurses and providers feel they have a voice, their willingness and tendency to use a product increases.

  • In order to sustain the new best practice, we continue to round daily on trauma patients and participate in morning report. In this way, we are identifying patients with catheters in place and mitigating issues prior to them arising. Also, it is critical to properly train the nursing staff and aides on proper placement and care for these external catheters as well as the criteria for placement. If our staff is educated and comfortable with a new best practice, we see an increase in compliance.

  • Evaluate your population to see where they are coming from. In our case, we see a large number of elderly patients coming in from nursing homes. We see this as a red flag when assessing for preexisting UTls and pay special attention to these patients to ensure they do not acquire a UTI on our watch.

Bibliography

"Healthcare-Associated Infections." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 19 July 2017. Available at: www.cdc.gov/ hai/ca_uti/uti.html. Accessed June 27, 2018.

"Healthcare-Associated Infections." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 5 Jan. 2018. Available at: www.cdc.gov/hai/ surveillance/data-reports/data-summary-assessing-progress.html. Accessed June 27, 2018.

"National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Outcome Measure." Hospital Safety Grade. Available at: www.hospitalsafetygrade.org/media/file/CAUTl.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2018.