“For patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery without adjuvant chemo or immunotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer, radiation therapy, when administered, is initiated <= 60 days of definitive surgery” (BCSRT).
The time to radiation therapy measure (BCSRT) will be retired. This decision was based on review of the literature and multiple conversations with key stakeholders, including practicing radiation oncologists, about the feasibility and relevance of the measure. There are no prospective or randomized studies examining the impact of the time interval from surgery to radiation therapy on cancer outcomes. There have been several single and multi-institution studies examining how the time interval from surgery to radiation impacts disease-specific survival, recurrence, and distant metastasis-free survival. However, none of these studies agree on a specific time interval associated with worse cancer outcomes. Most studies compared a longer time interval compared to a shorter time interval and examined the association with recurrence, except for one study that examined overall survival alone. The most recent study to examine this time interval utilized the National Cancer Database and showed that each month out from surgery to radiation therapy was associated with worse overall survival. A time interval >60 days was significantly associated with an approximately 20% worse overall survival1. Another study from 2017 showed no association between a time interval >55 days compared to shorter time intervals for disease-free survival or locoregional recurrence-free survival2. Two other studies showed that a delay of radiation therapy for up to 16 weeks was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence3,4, and a third study showed delays up to 20 weeks showed no difference in breast cancer-specific survival or locoregional free survival5.
In addition, the Breast Disease Site Group examined estimated performance rates (EPR) at different time intervals from surgery to radiation therapy to determine how lengthening the time interval on the quality measure would impact EPRs. Estimated performance rates at a time interval of 90 days were over 92%, indicating little room for improvement if a 90-day time interval was adopted for the measure. Lastly, several radiation oncologists commented that time intervals of greater than 90 days were acceptable in many radiation trials of breast cancer. These aforementioned factors and the insufficient data to support the 60-day time interval prompted the CoC to retire the BCSRT measure.