July 9, 2026
In this issue:
Join us at the 2026 ACS Quality, Safety & Cancer Conference (QSCC), July 30–August 2 in Orlando, Florida, for the interactive session “Ask the Experts: Cancer Accreditation Site Visit Q&A.” Site reviewers from the Commission on Cancer (CoC), National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC), and National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) will answer questions and provide guidance on the site visit process. Participants will gain clarity, practical tips, and insights to help them prepare with confidence for their program’s next site visit.
Additional QSCC sessions of note include:
The “Cancer QI Office Hours LIVE!” session will feature small-group discussions focusing on troubleshooting current quality improvement (QI) initiatives and planning for future projects. Participants will receive real-time feedback, share ideas, and collaborate with QI experts and peers.
Presenters at the “Patient-Centered Outcomes in Cancer Care” session will explore strategies for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into care and review the importance of aligning care with patient goals. Attendees will gain practical tools and conversation strategies to enhance engagement and improve the patient experience.
Register now to secure your spot and view the program agenda to start planning your QSCC experience.
The Cancer Surgery Standards Program (CSSP) recognizes those who participated in the recent public comment period for CoC Operative Standards 5.3, 5.4, 5.6, 5.7, and 5.8. We appreciate your willingness to participate in ongoing efforts by the CSSP to educate surgeons on the technical conduct of oncologic surgery and set standards for surgical care. All feedback will be considered for standards revisions.
Questions can be directed to CSSP@facs.org.
The National Cancer Database® (NCDB®) announces the early release of the 2025 Cancer Quality Improvement Program (CQIP) report. CQIP is a data-driven cancer QI initiative, focused on processes and outcomes.
This annual report provides short-term quality and outcome data, as well as long-term outcome data, including 5-year survival rates for commonly treated malignancies stratified by stage. CQIP allows programs to assess their quality and outcomes based on the data submitted to the NCDB.
This CQIP report includes data submitted to the Rapid Cancer Reporting System through May 2026 and provides CoC-accredited facilities with data on:
CoC-accredited programs can access this report through QPort. A complete CQIP slide directory is available in the “About CQIP” tab of the CQIP reporting application.
Contact NCDB@facs.org with any questions.
The NAPRC released an updated version of its accreditation standards, Optimal Resources for Rectal Cancer Care (2026 Standards). The NAPRC Standards Changelog provides full details for the July 2026 changes. Key updates include:
Standard 2.4 now recommends that patients presented at a Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Team meeting without all required specialties present be re-presented at a future meeting that includes the full multidisciplinary team. This suggestion reinforces the importance of comprehensive specialty input in treatment planning.
The synoptic reporting elements “Total Mesorectal Excision photographed” and “Short narrative” are no longer required in the surgical resection operative report. Similarly, the local excision operative report template no longer includes the specimen photograph element.
Edits were made to clarify that post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging examinations must meet the requirements of Standard 5.4 and use the appropriate Society of Abdominal Radiology reporting template.
Starting in 2027, post-neoadjuvant patient presentation must also include a post-treatment Computed Tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis.
The Post-Treatment Outcome Discussion and Summary template has been updated to reflect the changes to Standard 5.11.
Submit questions about the updates to the CAnswer Forum.
Learn more about best practices, patient care, and staging system updates in Cancer Programs on-demand webinars. Recent topics include:
Contact CancerProgramsEvents@facs.org with any questions.
Join the American Cancer Society and the Food is Medicine Coalition for a six-session Food is Medicine ECHO program focused on integrating nutrition into cancer care. Designed for cancer center staff, oncologists, and multidisciplinary oncology care teams, this program equips participants with practical, evidence-based strategies for applying Food is Medicine approaches in clinical settings.
Through case-based learning and expert-led discussions, participants will examine food access challenges, and review approaches to screening, referral, and care delivery in real-world oncology and payment environments.
Sessions will be held monthly from July through December.
Following the release of the American Cancer Society’s revised colorectal cancer screening guideline, updated educational materials, including an easy-to-read booklet and fact sheet, are available.
The new recommendations, published in the American Cancer Society’s flagship journal, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, reflect the latest science, new cancer screening technologies, and a focus on expanding screening options to reduce barriers to access.
The American Association of Pathologists' Assistants (AAPA) Grossing Guidelines provide a clinically aligned framework of best practices for handling cancer resection specimens at the surgical gross bench, which is the point of initial pathology examination.
Because pathology findings determine cancer stage and guide treatment decisions, proper specimen management at this stage is essential for accurate staging and preservation of tissue integrity. The 67 protocols align with College of American Pathologists (CAP) Cancer Protocols and the AJCC Staging System, supporting nationally recognized standards for quality cancer care.
The AAPA guidelines, available free of charge to verified pathology professionals, are evolving toward a digital format for structured data capture that complements the CAP cancer protocols while focusing on the gross examination. The fourth edition includes structured gross descriptions, standardized terminology, and specimen handling steps designed to promote consistency and support genomic integrity for molecular testing and targeted therapy decision-making.
Structured reporting and metadata improve efficiency and patient safety by creating concise, standardized macroscopic summaries that support specialty-specific interpretations. These summaries can be leveraged to support quality standards across pathology, oncology, surgery, and radiology within an institution, through partnerships with national stakeholders, or as part of accreditation initiatives. Correlation of gross findings with imaging, surgical planning, intraoperative findings, biopsy diagnoses, and microscopic analysis enables longitudinal tracking and large-scale data analysis to support evidence-based improvements throughout diagnosis, treatment planning, and therapy.
By strengthening documentation consistency and promoting robust, uniform data collection, the guidelines support accreditation standards and registry reporting. Structured data capture empowers the development of artificial intelligence-enabled applications through the generation of standardized, high-quality datasets and creates opportunities for education and competency benchmarking to promote consistency across training and practice.
The ACS CoC recognizes the following cancer sites for demonstrating their commitment to providing high-quality, patient-centered cancer care to patients and the community by recently earning CoC reaccreditation:
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, PA
Adventist Health Sierra Vista
San Luis Obispo, CA
Baptist Health Hardin
Elizabethtown, KY
JFK University Medical Center
Edison, NJ
Memorial Hermann Sugar Land Hospital
Sugar Land, TX
Mercy Health - St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital
Youngtown, OH
Shore Medical Center
Somers Point, NJ
St. Charles Medical Center-Bend
Bend, OR
St. Tammany Health System
Covington, LA
The ACS NAPBC recognizes the following breast sites for demonstrating their commitment to providing high-quality, patient-centered cancer care to patients and the community by recently earning NAPBC reaccreditation:
Abington Hospital - Jefferson Health
Abington, PA
AdventHealth Waterman
Tavares, FL
Chesapeake Regional Breast Center
Chesapeake, VA
Corewell Health Comprehensive Breast Care Program
Grand Rapids, MI
Prisma Health-Midlands Breast Center
Columbia, SC
Sanofi US Breast Care Program
Somerville, NJ
Sentara Dorothy G. Hoefer Comprehensive Breast Center
Newport News, VA
TriStar Sarah Cannon Cancer Center
Nashville, TN
July 30–August 2: ACS Quality, Safety & Cancer Conference
September 26–29: ACS Clinical Congress 2026