Unsupported Browser
The American College of Surgeons website is not compatible with Internet Explorer 11, IE 11. For the best experience please update your browser.
Menu
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
ACS
Literature Selections

Magnetic Compression May Simplify Revisional Sleeve Gastrectomy, Reduce Morbidity

March 24, 2026

acs-store-journalperiodical.jpg

Gagner Michel, Almutlaq, Ribeiro R, et al. Linear Magnetic Compression Gastroileostomy Bipartition (MagGI): Feasibility and Early Outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. March 2026

A multisite study of magnetic gastroileostomy bipartition (MagGI procedure) as a revisional option for suboptimal sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was conducted in adults (body mass index [BMI, kg/m2] ≥30.0–≤50.0). After one magnet was delivered endoscopically to the ileum and another magnet to the gastric antrum, magnets were laparoscopically approximated to initiate gradual compression anastomosis. The 90-day primary feasibility endpoint was magnet placement (≥90% of cases), magnet passage without reintervention, and patent anastomosis creation. 

Between November 2023 and July 2024, 20 enrolled patients (mean age 46.1 years, BMI 37.1 ± 0.8, weight 101.0 ± 3.0 kg) underwent SG-revisional MagGI. There was 100% magnet placement, a median passage of 31 days, and patent anastomosis confirmed in all cases. 

80% (47/59) of adverse events were low grade (Clavien-Dindo I-II). Two intestinal tears (grade III) due to bowel forceps were repaired and resolved; 4 grade-IV SAEs occurred, with none related to the magnet device. There was no anastomotic leak, bleeding, or mortality.

Respective 6- (n = 17) and 12- (n = 7) month total weight loss was 16.9% and 23.4%, with excess weight loss totaling 57.5% and 66.0%. BMI reduction was 6.2 and 9.1 kg/m2, respectively, and all patients noted they would recommend the procedure in a follow up questionnaire.

Preliminary findings suggested that SG-revisional MagGI was technically feasible and achieved promising excess weight loss. While longer-term follow-up in larger cohorts is needed to establish safety and efficacy, surgeons who perform revisional for suboptimal SG are encouraged to keep apprised of developments in this potentially less morbid approach.