Unsupported Browser
The American College of Surgeons website is not compatible with Internet Explorer 11, IE 11. For the best experience please update your browser.
Menu
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
ACS
Literature Selections

Sleeve Gastrectomy Shows Advantages over Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty

June 23, 2026

acs-store-journalperiodical.jpg

Leslie ZD, Bazerbachi F, Dirweesh A, Shankar S, et al. Target Trial Emulation of 6-Month Weight Change after Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty and Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Am Coll Surg. June 2026.

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) offers a less invasive alternative to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) while preserving gastric anatomy; however, comparative effectiveness data from large real-world cohorts remain limited. Using the 2023 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) follow-up file, Leslie and colleagues compared short-term weight loss and clinical outcomes after ESG and SG.

ESG and SG cases were identified from the 2023 MBSAQIP follow-up file. Using target trial emulation methodology, patients underwent 1:8 nearest-neighbor matching on age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular comorbidity, and highest preoperative body mass index. The primary outcome was percent weight change (%WC) from highest preoperative weight to 6 months. The primary analysis used inverse probability of censoring weighting regression to account for missing 6-month weights. Secondary outcomes included 30-day adverse events and 6-month comorbidity and laboratory outcomes.

The matched cohort included 3,753 patients (ESG, 417; SG, 3,336). At 6 months, SG achieved greater weight loss than ESG (−18.51% ± 7.98 versus −12.33% ± 6.96; p<0.001). In inverse probability of censoring weighting regression, SG remained associated with greater %WC (ESG coefficient +7.40; 95% CI, 6.59–8.21). Absolute adverse-event rates were low in both groups. SG demonstrated more favorable comorbidity outcomes, whereas ESG was associated with higher 30-day and 6-month readmission (3.8% versus 1.6%) and reoperation (1.0% versus 0.3%) rates.

Although ESG produced clinically meaningful weight reduction and low absolute adverse-event rates, its higher readmission and reoperation rates should be considered during procedure selection and patient counseling.