Abdominal wall hernias can often be repaired by suture approximation of the edges of the defect. But this approach is followed by a high incidence of recurrent herniation.1 The use of permanent synthetic prosthetic mesh materials provides a more secure repair, particularly for large defects.1,2 Frequently, there is no viable tissue available to separate the synthetic material from direct contact with the abdominal viscera, in which circumstance, adhesions of omentum and intestine always develop. One potential complication of such adhesions is intestinal obstruction. A more serious problem is that of intestinal fistulization through the junction of the prosthetic material with the abdominal wall.3-5

The most commonly used meshes are knitted, are macroporous, are synthesized from polypropylene or polyethylene, and share the potential for causing intestinal complications.3,5,6 An ideal prosthesis would not induce intraabdominal adhesions but at the same time would firmly incorporate into the abdominal wall. Smooth-surfaced impermeable materials, such as silicone, which effectively resist adhesion formation, do not develop the necessary fixation to the adjacent fascia and muscle.

Several experimental models have been used to investigate these issues.7-9 Time intervals for observation after prosthesis installation have varied from hours to months, but always involved a single observation per animal. We suggest here that adhesion formation is better studied by sequential observations than at a single arbitrary time.

The purpose of this article is to describe the dynamics of visceral adhesion formation to polypropylene mesh. The major innovation reported here is the use of repeated peritoneoscopy to allow serial observations and surgical manipulations of adhesions. The first set of experiments addressed the questions: 1) What role does omentum play in adhesion formation? and 2) What is the significance of the tissue backing the porous prosthesis, ie, peritoneum versus subcutaneous tissue? These observations were made at necropsy. The second group of studies involved repeated laparoscopy to determine adhesion dynamics, and timed sacrifice to obtain tissues for scanning electron microscopy of the prosthetic surface.

Introduction | Methods | Results | Discussion | References

 

JACS

 


This page and all contents are Copyright © 1996-2000
by the American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL 60611-3211