|
WILMS' TUMOR
Wilms' tumor is the most common embryonic malignancy of renal
origin. Approximately 500 new patients are seen annually in the
United States.13,14 Although the overall management of children
with Wilms' tumor is one of the great success stories in cancer
therapy and currently more than 90% of children survive 4 years
after their diagnosis, there is still room for improvement.
Genetic considerations
Children susceptible to Wilms' tumor are born with a constitutional
DNA mutation in one allele of a gene. One copy of a presumed
tumor suppressor gene mutation is inherited from one parent and
results from a spontaneous mutation. Under these circumstances,
a new genetic event such as deletion of inhibition of the paired
allele of the gene would be needed for tumorigenesis to occur.
This genetic presentation increases the likelihood of bilateral
tumors and earlier age at onset as compared with sporadic cases,
in which tumorigenesis requires two independent mutations.2,5,6
Two-event activation of a tumor suppressor gene occurs at two
different genetic sites. The first allele is inactivated by mutation
of the gene itself; the second allele is inactivated by loss
of heterozygosity (a loss of chromosomal material).
Wilms' tumor occurring in children with aniridia, genitourinary
abnormalities, and mental retardation is known as the WAGR syndrome.2,13
Wilms' tumor will develop in 30% of these children. The karyotypic
analysis of these patients demonstrates a deletion of the short
arm (the p arm) of one copy of chromosome 11 at the 11p13 locus.
The syndrome actually encompasses a number of contiguous genes,
including the aniridia gene PAX6 and the first Wilms'
tumor suppressor gene, called WT1. In contrast to WAGR,
children with the Denys-Drash syndrome with Wilms' tumor have
only point mutations of the WT1 gene.13 These patients
account for approximately 1% of all children with Wilms' tumor.
In instances of unilateral Wilms' tumor, fewer than 15% will
have mutations of the WT1 gene. This suggests that more
than one genetic locus is involved in the development of Wilms'
tumor.
Children with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome have the WT2
gene, characterized by a loss of DNA at the 11p15 locus.15-18
Much interest has been focused on insulin-like growth factor
II, which resides in 11p15, because it is subject to genomic
imprinting. An additional Wilms' tumor locus is seen on the long
arm (the q arm) of chromosome 16 (16q). This occurs in approximately
20% of patients with Wilms' tumor.2,19 Some investigators have
suggested that this is a statistically important adverse prognostic
factor. These patients have a relapse rate 3 times higher and
a mortality rate 12 times higher than Wilms' tumor patients without
loss of heterozygosity. Twelve percent of Wilms' tumor patients
have loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 1p, and they too have
higher relapse and mortality rates. The involvement of genes
at 11p13, 11p15, and 16q3 does not play a role in familial cases
of Wilms' tumors where a detailed linkage analysis is required.
Children with nephrogenic rests in their kidneys are at risk
for mutational change and development of Wilms' tumor.20
Clinical presentation
Most patients with Wilms' tumor are between the ages of 1
and 4 years; the mean age is 3 years. Wilms' tumor usually presents
as a smooth, round, nontender abdominal flank mass. Hematuria
is observed in 20% of patients; hypertension (due to renin-angiotensin
release related to compression of the juxtaglomerular apparatus)
in 20%; anorexia, fever, and weight loss in approximately 10%;
and occasionally polycythemia (due to erythropoietin release)
is noted. Approximately 10% of patients are diagnosed after the
onset of hematuria or flank pain following trivial renal trauma.
Coexisting conditions associated with an increased risk of Wilms'
tumor include Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, sporadic aniridia,
hemihypertrophy, a positive family history, Denys-Drash syndrome,
Perlman's syndrome, WAGR syndrome, and Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome.2,13,18
Patients with aniridia having hemihypertrophy and those with
Beckwith Wiedemann's syndrome should be screened with a surveillance
renal ultrasonographic examination every 3 months until they
are 8 to 10 years of age.17 In familial instances, there is a
20% incidence of bilateral Wilms' tumor, which are synchronous
in two-thirds of the patients. The incidence of bilateral Wilms'
tumor is only 4% to 5% in sporadic cases.18,21
Diagnosis
Evaluation of the renal mass is accomplished by obtaining
an ultrasound to determine whether the mass is cystic or solid,
followed by CT of the abdomen with contrast. The ultrasound usually
confirms that the mass is solid, but there is a variant of Wilms'
tumor that is cystic and is associated with an improved prognosis.
Abdominal ultrasonographic examination may also be helpful in
identifying intravascular extension of tumor into the renal vein
and vena cava. In selected patients, echocardiography is useful
in identifying atrial tumor extension. The CT shows an intrarenal
neoplasm that displaces the collecting system medially in most
patients.22 Chest radiograph and, in some instances, chest CT
are obtained to assess for pulmonary metastases.
Tumor histologic type and the stage of disease at diagnosis
are important predictors of survival. Ninety percent of tumors
with favorable histology respond well to chemotherapy. Favorable
histology includes blastemal epithelial, myxoid, and cystic components.23,
24 Ten percent of the tumors have unfavorable (anaplastic) histology.
Three additional pediatric renal tumors include sarcomatous,
clear cell, and rhabdoid lesions, which are considered separate
entities from Wilms' tumor but are treated as unfavorable variants.
Three-fourths of these lesions present as either stage III or
stage IV tumors, and patients have a 3-year survival rate of
less than 20%. Clear cell tumors metastasize early to the brain
and bone; anaplastic tumors often relapse despite more aggressive
therapy. Rhabdoid tumors are the least common but most lethal
of the pediatric renal tumors. Renal cell carcinoma also can
occur in childhood and carries a 50% mortality rate.
A key factor in the management of Wilms' tumor is resection
of the primary tumor. This is accomplished through a generous
transverse, transperitoneal approach. Early control of the vessels
is preferred when possible.25 Evaluating for extension of tumor
into the renal vein and vena cava is an important consideration.
Great care is taken to remove the tumor without violating the
capsule to avoid tumor spillage, which adversely affects outcomes.
During the procedure, perirenal and paraaortic lymph nodes are
acquired for staging purposes, but a formal retroperitoneal lymph
node dissection is unnecessary.26 The contralateral kidney should
be evaluated for a second tumor. Intracaval tumor extension that
is identified preoperatively by ultrasonographic examination
often responds to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.27 Initially unresectable
tumors also shrink when treated with chemotherapy and can be
excised subsequently at second-look surgical procedures.28 Bilateral
Wilms' tumor is usually managed by initial biopsy of both kidneys
and chemotherapy. The goal is to salvage the renal parenchyma
if possible with delayed second-look resection and bilateral
heminephrectomy. This may not be possible in many patients, and
complete nephrectomy on one side and partial nephrectomy on the
other may be necessary.13,18,25,29 If both kidneys are not amenable
to partial resection, additional chemotherapy is administered
and a third-look laparotomy is performed. Patients that are unresponsive
and require bilateral nephrectomy are managed with peritoneal
dialysis and chemotherapy for 1 year before renal transplantation.
Staging
In the National Wilms' Tumor Study-4 (NWTS-4), patients were
randomized according to their tumor stage and histologic type
and whether they received standard chemotherapy administration
or pulse-intensified treatments after tumor resection.2,13,18
The current staging criteria for Wilms' tumor are listed in Table
1. Stage I patients with favorable histology (low-risk category)
did not have radiation and received actinomycin D and vincristine
for 24 weeks or pulse-intensive actinomycin D and vincristine
for 18 weeks. Stage I patients with anaplasia were treated similarly.
Stage II patients with favorable histology (low risk) received
no radiation and were randomized to receive either actinomycin
D or vincristine for 22 weeks or 65 weeks, respectively. They
were compared with a similar group of patients who received pulse-intensive
actinomycin D and vincristine for either 18 weeks or 60 weeks.
Stage III patients with favorable histology (intermediate risk)
received radiation therapy (1,080 cGy) and were randomized to
receive actinomycin D and vincristine for either 26 or 65 weeks
versus pulse-intensive actinomycin D and vincristine for either
24 or 54 weeks. Patients with higher risk tumors, which included
clear cell sarcoma of the kidney, and stage IV patients with
favorable histology were considered for this arm of the protocol.
Any patients with stages II through IV tumors with anaplasia
(high risk) received radiotherapy and were randomized to actinomycin
D, vincristine, and doxorubicin for 65 weeks or actinomycin D,
vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide for 65 weeks.
Table 1. Staging Criteria: National Wilms' Tumor Study
5
|
|
Stage |
Criteria |
|
|
I |
A tumor limited to the kidney and completely resected. The renal
capsule must be intact without rupture or violation. The vessels
of the renal sinus are free of disease. |
|
II |
A tumor that extends beyond the kidney but is completely resected.
There may be regional extension of tumor related to penetration
of the capsule or invasion of the renal sinus. Blood vessels
outside the renal sinus may contain tumor. The tumor may be violated
by a biopsy or sustain spillage of tumor that is confined to
the flank area. When the resection is completed, there should
be no microscopic evidence of tumor at or beyond the margins
of resection. |
|
III |
There is residual tumor confined to the abdomen or lymph nodes
in the renal hilum or pelvis, penetration of tumor through the
peritoneal surface, tumor implants on the peritoneal surface,
either gross or microscopic tumor at or beyond the margin of
the surgical resection, or an incomplete resection because of
local infiltration into vital structures; finally, there may
be generalized tumor spread that is not confined to the flank
area. |
|
IV |
Hematogenous metastatic disease to lung, liver, bone, or brain
or lymph node metastases outside the abdomen or pelvis. Pulmonary
nodules observed on chest CT must be biopsied for definitive
diagnosis of stage IV disease. |
|
V |
Bilateral renal involvement at diagnosis. The tumors on each
side must be staged individually according to the above noted
criteria . |
|
The results of NWTS-4 are listed in Table 2. For children
with tumors with favorable histology with either stage I or II
disease, there were no significant differences in survival according
to the various arms of the protocols. Approximately 98.6% of
patients with stage I disease survived and 89% of patients with
stage II disease survived using standard therapy, compared with
98% with pulse-intensive therapy with stage I disease and 85%
with stage II disease. Slightly lower survival was seen in the
children older than 4 years. For stage I anaplastic tumors, survival
was better with standard therapy than with pulse-intensive therapy
(92.3% versus 85.7%). In patients with stage III tumors and favorable
histology, there were no significant advantages to pulse-intensive
therapy. Survival was achieved in 98.6% of patients after pulse-intensive
therapy versus 99.3% of patients given standard therapy in the
first 2 years of life. In patients with stage IV disease with
favorable histology (three-quarters had lung metastases), similar
outcomes were obtained with standard versus pulse-intensive therapy.13,30
All patients with stages II to IV disease with unfavorable histology
demonstrated a higher survival with pulse-intensive therapy (90.9%)
than with standard therapy (71.4%). In instances of clear cell
sarcoma, the relapse-free rate was similar among patients receiving
pulse-intensive versus standard therapy, but the survival was
slightly better in the pulse-intensive group.
Table 2. Results of National Wilms' Tumor Study 4
|
|
|
|
Standard Rx |
Pulse-intensive Rx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage |
Age (y) |
Relapse
free (%) |
Survival
(%) |
Relapse
free (%) |
Survival
(%) |
|
|
I/FH |
2 |
92.5 |
99.6 |
94.3 |
98.6 |
|
|
4 |
91.0 |
98.5 |
92.3 |
97.3 |
|
I/ana |
2 |
93.8 |
92.3 |
87.5 |
85.7 |
|
|
4 |
93.8 |
9.3 |
87.5 |
85.7 |
|
II/FH |
2 |
89.0 |
|
85.4 |
|
|
|
4 |
84.0 |
|
82.8 |
|
|
III/FH |
2 |
95.2 |
99.3 |
90.8 |
98.6 |
|
|
4 |
91.5 |
93.8 |
88.9 |
94.4 |
|
IV/FH |
2 |
79.5 |
89.2 |
78.5 |
88.0 |
|
|
4 |
77.5 |
89.1 |
74.5 |
80.0 |
|
IV/FH, lung met |
2 |
71.4 |
71.4 |
90.9 |
90.9 |
|
|
4 |
71.4 |
71.4 |
90.9 |
90.9 |
|
Clear cell |
2 |
82.4 |
95.5 |
83.4 |
100.0 |
|
|
4 |
66.0 |
88.6 |
79.0 |
95.0 |
|
Ana, anaplasia; FH, favorable histology; lung
met, lung metastases; Rx, treatment.
Current protocols
In the current National Wilms' Tumor Study (NWTS-5), patients
are randomized for treatment according to their risk assessment.
Low-risk patients include those with stage I favorable histology
who are less than 24 months old and with tumors less than 500
g, stage I with tumors greater than 500 g, more than 24 months
old with favorable histology or focal or diffuse anaplasia, and
stage II with favorable histology. These patients are managed
by nephrectomy and receive actinomycin D and vincristine for
18 weeks. Intermediate-risk patients include those with stage
III and stage IV tumors with favorable histology, stages II to
IV with focal anaplasia, and stage IV with favorable histology
and CT-documented lung metastases (Table 3). These patients are
treated by nephrectomy and receive actinomycin D, vincristine,
and doxorubicin for 24 weeks; plus radiotherapy to the tumor
bed (1,080 cGy) and to the lung (1,080 cGy) in instances of CT-detected
lung metastases. High-risk patients include those with stages
II to IV disease with diffuse anaplasia and stages I to IV clear
cell renal tumors. After nephrectomy, these children receive
four chemotherapy agents (doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide,
and etoposide) for 24 weeks and 1,080 cGy of radiotherapy within
9 days of resection. Nephrectomy and three-drug chemotherapy,
including carboplatinum, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide for
24 weeks, are used to treat children with rhabdoid tumors in
stages I to IV.
Table 3. Risk Categories and Treatment from National Wilms'
Tumor Study 5
|
|
Risk |
Stage |
Characteristics |
Treatment |
|
|
Low |
I |
Favorable histology, focal or diffuse anaplasia |
Nephrectomy, actinomycin D, vincristine (18 wk) |
|
|
II |
Favorable histology |
Nephrectomy, actinomycin D, vincristine (18 wk) |
|
Intermediate |
III, IV |
Favorable histology |
Nephrectomy, actinomycin D, vincristine, doxorubicin (24 wk).
Radiotherapy: 1,080 cGy to tumor bed, 1,200 cGy to lung metastases |
|
|
II-IV |
Focal anaplasia |
Nephrectomy, actinomycin D, vincristine, doxorubicin (24 wk).
Radiotherapy: 1,080 cGy to tumor bed, 1,200 cGy to lung metastases |
|
|
IV |
Favorable histology plus lung metastases on chest CT |
Nephrectomy, actinomycin D, vincristine, doxorubicin (24 wk).
Radiotherapy: 1,080 cGy to tumor bed, 1,200 cGy to lung metastases |
|
High |
II-IV |
Diffuse anaplasia |
Nephrectomy, doxorubicin, vincristine, actinomycin D, and etoposide
(24 wk). Radiotherapy: 1,080 cGy to tumor bed, 1,200 cGy to lung
metastases |
|
|
I-IV |
Clear cell renal tumors |
Nephrectomy, doxorubicin, vincristine, actinomycin D, and etoposide
(24 wk). Radiotherapy: 1,080 cGy to tumor bed, 1,200 cGy to lung
metastases |
|
|
I-IV |
Rhabdoid tumors |
Nephrectomy, carboplatinum, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (24
wk) |
|
The main objective of NWTS-5 is to determine whether loss
of heterozygosity of chromosome 16q and 1p is associated with
worse outcomes. NWTS-5 will also evaluate whether DNA ploidy
(diploid status) is associated with worse outcomes in children
who have favorable histology. Additional goals of the study are
to decrease the acute and longterm morbidity of treatment in
children with Wilms' tumor by limiting the intensity and duration
of initial treatment and to use a more consistent chemotherapy
retrieval program for patients who relapse. Another goal is to
improve the disease-free interval of patients with unfavorable
histology, including those with diffuse anaplasia and clear cell
sarcoma of the kidney, by using new chemotherapy programs that
include etoposide and cyclophosphamide and treating rhabdoid
tumors of the kidney with carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide.
Further study of the biologic nature of Wilms' tumor and particularly
its biology and pathology in instances of bilateral tumor is
planned. The search to identify a specific tumor marker for Wilms'
tumor is also a priority, but has remained elusive. |