|
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||||||||
Disasters from Biological and Chemical TerrorismWhat Should the Individual Surgeon Do?: A Report from the Committee on TraumaIn the weeks following the September 11 disaster, we have all been asking how we can prepare for a homeland disaster response to acts of biological and/or chemical terrorism and how we as individual surgeons can get involved. The exact answer to these questions is not yet clear. Increasingly, we are beginning to identify the approach that we should each take in our communities. Following are some concepts and recommendations to guide each Fellow as we proceed toward developing a definitive answer to these questions. An organized response A trauma and EMS system is designed to be an organized response to injury. As such, it has many of the elements needed for a disaster response, including identification of injury, transport of the injured, a communications network, designation of receiving facilities or hospitals, and specifics details of medical care that would be appropriate at the point of injury and at receiving hospitals. The response required for a biological or chemical disaster may be proportionally different, but, in principle, is still an organized response to injury. Differences would include: the magnitude and types of injury, the numbers of injured, and the risk to providers of exposure and personal injury. Chemical and biological disasters may not be addressed by trauma systems planning in a local community, and a disaster response will differ from a traditional trauma/EMS system in four ways. First, the traditional hospital-based trauma program will need to be modified to include a chemical or biological response ability. Such capability will require involvement of various different elements within the hospital in addition to the traditional trauma program. Second, at the local/regional level, each hospital needs to be integrated with the county or state disaster plan and the government agencies that would be involved in such a plan. The details of the biological and chemical disaster plans will differ from conventional trauma/EMS disaster plans. Third, a disaster of significant proportion may require the participation of the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) and the military. How this system is activated and interfaced with the local/regional response should also be clear to everyone involved. Finally, the uniqueness of biological and chemical injuries may exceed a practitioner's current knowledge, which may include deficiencies in knowledge regarding techniques of surveillance and detection, the need for specific procedures to protect prehospital and hospital providers, the signs and symptoms of disease, and treatment. As we respond to this challenge we all must:
The surgeon's role Surgeons are natural leaders. We should lead this effort in our communities. The following are specific recommendations for surgeons to consider:
Beyond participating in their local hospital and community plans, surgeons are asking how they might participate at the national or international level in either a homeland disaster or war. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma will continue to provide information with regard to these opportunities as they are clarified. Currently, participation in the NDMS by joining a local DMAT team is one possibility. Further information can be accessed at http://www.ndms.dhhs.gov/. The College will continue to use ACS NewsScope, its Web site, and the Trauma Office to provide answers to questions regarding available resources for all Fellows. Unconventional Civilian Disasters: What the Surgeon Should Know Resources on Bioterrorism and Unconventional Civilian Disasters
by the American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL 60611-3211 |