Nonsite-Specific Publications
Gay, E. Greer (November 2006) The Commission on Cancer, American College of Surgeons’ Response to HIPAA, Chapter 11. In Cancer Clinical Trials: Proactive Strategies, Leong, S.P.L. (ed.). Norwell, MA: Springer Publishers, pp. 209-218.
Wingo PA, Luke E, O'Brian K, Brogan DJ, Chen VW, Wu XC, Tucker T, Howe HL, Ross F, Vann S, Stewart AK, Chmiel JS, Sylvester J, Bumpus RE, Shen T. Population-based patterns of care studies: Collaboration among state cancer registries, The American College of Surgeons, and The American Cancer Society. J Reg Mgmt 2001; 28:3-16.
Bland KI, Menck HR, Partridge EE, Fremgen AM, Scott-Connor CEH, Hundahl SA, Winchester DP, Morrow M. The National Cancer Data Base: What does it mean to the community surgeon? J Surgical Oncology 2000; 73:189-191. (!)
Stewart AK, Bland KI, McGinnis LS, Morrow M, Eyre HJ. Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base. CA Cancer J Clin 2000; 50:171-183. (!)
Fremgen AM, Bland KI, McGinnis LS, Eyre HJ, McDonald CJ, Menck HR, Murphy GP. Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base 1999. CA 1999; 49:145-158. (!)
Bedwani R, Clive R, Hudson T, Hundahl S. International Union Against Cancer, Committee on International Collaborative Activities: Gulf States Symposium on Cancer Registration. Cancer 1998:1404-7. (!)
Menck HR, Bland KI, Scott-Conner CEH, Eyre HJ, Murphy GP, Winchester DP. Regional diversity and breadth of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 1998; 83:2649-2658. (!)
Menck HR, Bland KI, Eyre H, Cunningham MP, Fremgen AM, Murphy GP, Winchester DP. Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base: 1997. CA 1998; 48: 134-145. (!)
Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB, Henson DE, Weinstein JN, Harrell FE, Marks JR, Winchester DP, Bostwick DG. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer 1997; 79:857-862. (*) (!)
Menck HR, Blankenship CM, Fremgen AM. The National Cancer Data Base and physician network. Topics Health Inform Mgt 1997; 17:45-59.
Menck HR, Cunningham MP, Jessup JM, Eyre HJ, Winchester DP, Scott-Conner CEH, Murphy GP. The growth and maturation of the national cancer data base. Cancer 1997; 80:2296-304. (!)
Menck HR, Jessup JM, Eyre HJ, Cunningham MP, Fremgen AM, Murphy GP, Winchester DP. Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base:1997. CA 1997; 47:161-170.
Mettlin CJ, Menck HR, Winchester DP, Murphy GP. A comparison of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers reported to the National Cancer Data Base and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer 1997; 79:2052-2061. (!)
-
SEER data from 1992 on 18,322 breast, 13,427 colorectal, 15,276 lung, and 21,501 prostate cancers were compared with NCDB data on 96,323 breast, 69,456 colorectal, 108,702 lung, and 107,690 prostate cancers. Similar levels of data completeness were observed. The NCDB data tended to contain less complete information about the Spanish or Hispanic ethnicity of patients. Tumor grade data tended to be incomplete in both series. Stage information about lung and prostate cancer was more often missing in SEER data. Patient age, race, and gender in NCDB data differed little from corresponding SEER data, except that SEER data reported a greater proportion of patients in the "other" race category that included Asian-Americans and American Indians. Tumor laterality, anatomic site, tumor grade, and types of surgical treatment were similar in the NCDB and SEER data. Radical mastectomy was performed in 49.4% of SEER breast cancer cases compared with 49.2% of NCDB cases. Cancer-directed surgery was observed less often among SEER prostate cancer cases than among NCDB cases. The NCDB data also indicated greater use of radiation therapy than the SEER data for the four types of cancer reviewed. The 1992 NCDB data, in aggregate, described patient and disease treatment characteristics and patterns that differed only marginally from those described in the SEER data from the same year.
Strukus W, Blankenship CM, Menck HR. Success Stories II: Cancer Liaison Physicians Using NCDB Data to Influence Patient Care. Chicago, IL: Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons; 1997.
Jessup JM, McGinnis LS, Winchester DP, Eyre HJ, Fremgen AM, Murphy GP, Menck HR. Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base:1996. CA 1996; 46:185-192.
Jessup JM, Menck HR, Winchester DP, Hundahl SA, Murphy GP. The national cancer data base report on patterns of hospital reporting. Cancer 1996; 78:1829-37. (!)
Fremgen AM, Jessup JM, Menck HR. Hospital use of NCDB data to assess quality of cancer patient care. J Registry Management 1995; 22:69-71.
Jessup JM, Steele GD, Winchester DP. Introduction. In: Steele GD, Jessup JM, Winchester DP, Menck HR, Murphy GP: eds. National Cancer Data Base: Annual review of patient care, 1995. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 1995; 1-11.
Partridge EE. Triad for change-A new concept for cancer prevention, control, treatment, and rehabilitation. J Surg Oncol 1995; 60:147-148.
Ploetz BM, Fremgen AM, Menck HR: eds. Success Stories: Using Comparative Data to Improve Cancer Patient Care. Chicago, American College of Surgeons, 1995.
Steele GD, Jessup JM, Winchester DP, Menck HR, Murphy GP: eds. NationalCancer Data Base: Annual review of patient care, 1995. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 1995.
Steele GD, Jessup LM, Winchester DP, Murphy GP, Menck HR. Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base: 1995. CA 1995; 45:102-111.
2nd NCDB/NCRA Task Force for Quality Improvement: Data Utilization Workshop, Faculty Manual, Chicago, Illinois, American College of Surgeons, 1994.
2nd NCDB/NCRA Task Force for Quality Improvement: Data Utilization Workshop, Student Manual, Chicago, Illinois, American College of Surgeons, 1994.
Eberle C. Benchmarking - An oncology tool already in place. Newsbreak, Illinois Health Information Management Association Volume X, Issue 6, November, 1994.
Gray C. Submitting data to the National Cancer Data Base. Opportunity for external benchmarking. Connection, Chicago, National Cancer Registrars Association, February/March 1994.
Johnson CH. Use National Cancer Data Base statistics to do patient care evaluations. The (NCRA) Abstract 1994; 21:14-16.
Murphy GP. The National Cancer Data Base: A vital commitment. CA 1994; 44:69-70.
Steele GD, Osteen RT, Winchester DP, Murphy GP, Menck HR. Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base: 1994. CA 1994; 44:71-80.
Steele GD, Winchester DP. Introduction. In: Steele GD, Winchester DP, Osteen RT, Menck HR, Murphy GP: eds. National Cancer Data Base: Annual review of patient care, 1994. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 1994.
Steele GD, Winchester DP, Menck HR. National Cancer Data Base: A mechanism for assessment of patient care. Cancer 1994; 73:499-504.
Steele GD, Winchester DP, Osteen RT, Menck HR, Murphy GP: eds. National Cancer Data Base: Annual review of patient care, 1994. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 1994.
Ebert PA. As I See It. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 1993; 78:2.
Jones GW. Magnitude of the problem: American College of Surgeons database and eidemiologic study. Cancer 1993; 71:887-890.
Menck HR. Making data work for patient care. The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). The Savannah River Region Health Information System Newsletter, Medical University of South Carolina, July 1993.
Menck HR. A preliminary study of NCDB representativeness. In: Steele GD, Winchester DP, Menck HR, Murphy GP: eds. National Cancer Data Base: Annual review of patient care, 1993. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 1993; 93-102.
NCDB/NTRA Task Force for Quality Improvment. Advanced Quality Improvement Workshop, Faculty Course Materials, Chicago, Illinois, American College of Surgeons, 1993.
NCDB/NTRA Task Force for Quality Improvment. Advanced Quality Improvement Workshop, Student Workbook, Chicago, Illinois, American College of Surgeons, 1993.
Steele GD, Winchester DP, Menck HR, Murphy GP. Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base:1993. CA 1993; 43:71-82.
Steele GD, Winchester DP, Menck HR, Murphy GP. National Cancer Data Base: Annual review of patient care, 1993. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 1993.
Kennedy BJ, Menck HR, Steele GD, Winchester DP. National Cancer Data Base: A clinical assessment of patients with cancer. Cancer 1992; 69:1341.
Murphy GP. The National Cancer Data Base (Editorial). CA 1992; 41:5-6.
Stahl DL, Opaluch GM, Winchester DP. The purpose and value of tumor registries. Cont Oncol 1992; 2:29-33.
Steele GD, Winchester DP, Menck HR, Murphy GP. National Cancer Data Base: Annual review of patient care, 1992. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 1992.
Trimble EL, Winchester DP, Niederhuber JE. The attitudes of surgeons toward clinical trials. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 1992; 77:23-28.
Kennedy BJ, Menck HR, Steele GD, Winchester DP. National Cancer Data Base (Abstract). J Cancer Educ 1991; 6:36.
Menck HR, Garfinkel L, Dodd GD. Preliminary report of the National Cancer Data Base. CA 1991; 41:19-36.
Mettlin CJ, Shoenfeld E, Natarajan N, Suh O. Interhospital differences in cancer survival. J Chron Dis 1987; 40:157-164. (*)
Beart RW. An interpretation of the patient care evaluation studies. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 1986; 71:27-28. (*)
Natarajan N, Mettlin CJ, Beart RW, Murphy GP. Design and analysis of national patterns of care surveys of the American College of Surgeons. Neoplasia 1985; 2:5-10.
Murphy GP, Mettlin CJ, Gerlach R. Advances in clinical oncology including terminal care of cancer patient. Internation Congress Series 622. Recent Advances in Cancer Control. Proceedings of the 6th Asia Pacific Cancer Conference; Sendar, Japan; September 27-30, 1983. Edited by S Yamagaka, T Hirayarra, S Hisamidii. (*)
Natarajan N, Mettlin CJ, Murphy GP. Patterns-of-care surveys of the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer. In: Mettlin CJ, Murphy GP, eds. Progress in cancer control III: A regional approach. New York, Alan R. Liss, Inc., 1983:187-199. (*)
Schmitz RL. Patterns-of-care studies: Results and consequences. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 1980; 65:20-22. (*)
Clinical Infomation Bibliography