Advocacy and Health Policy
Home Page Members Only Table of Contents Search This Site Contact Us Site Index

March 2006

Note: Questions relating to state legislative activity or any of the items noted in ACS Cross Country may be directed to Mindy Baker, State Affairs Associate, at mbaker@facs.org. 

Indiana Trauma Legislation Close to Enactment

Image: seat belt
The Indiana General Assembly is considering two trauma-related bills in its current legislative session.  The first, SB 88, requires every occupant of a motor vehicle to wear a safety belt (with certain limited exceptions) and every motor vehicle sold in the state to be equipped with safety belts.  The second bill, SB 284, authorizes the Department of Health as the lead agency for the development, implementation, and oversight of a comprehensive trauma care system.  Both bills passed the Senate (26-21 for SB 88; 50-0 for SB 284), and at press time were under consideration by their respective House committees.

  

States May Require Attorneys to Carry Malpractice Insurance

Image: Virginia
Citing an increasing number of lawsuits, New Jersey, Tennessee, and Virginia all have introduced legislation in 2006 that focuses attention on the problem of uninsured attorneys.

A resolution in Virginia, which passed the House 92-6, asks the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Virginia State Bar to examine the problem of uninsured attorneys and to consider either requiring malpractice insurance for attorneys, or creating a client/victim compensation fund.

In New Jersey, HB 2341 (which is currently in the Judiciary Committee) would require attorneys to carry malpractice insurance of at least $100,000.  This bill is similar to legislation introduced in 2005. 

Tennessee’s HB 2877 does not require that attorneys carry malpractice insurance, but rather  requires those attorneys who advertise to include a statement disclosing both whether they have malpractice insurance, and if so, “the per incident and aggregate liability limits of such policy.”  HB 2877 was introduced February 16 and passed first consideration.

 

Bariatric Medicine Legislation Is on the Rise

Image: paperwork
As obesity continues to be a major health concern for many Americans, states are struggling to keep pace with bariatric medicine issues.  Currently, many states do not have laws that pro-vide for mandatory medical treatment for the morbidly obese.  On February 21, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced federal regulations to provide for Medicare coverage of bariatric surgery, and it is anticipated that the states and private payers will take notice and follow suit.

 

Medicare will not cover bariatric surgery procedures for beneficiaries who are only overweight. The beneficiaries also must have at least one disease associated with obesity, such as hyperten-sion, type 2 diabetes, or heart disease.

Missouri and Virginia have recently introduced legislation on required treatment.  Although Virginia’s HB 624 was tabled in committee, Missouri’s SB 597 is currently getting a second reading in the Small Business, Insurance & Industrial Relations Committee.

In Georgia, HR 1159 asks the Department of Community Health, the Department of Human Resources, and the Insurance Department to “collect data on individual cases of obesity in order to evaluate whether health insurance coverage for the treatment of obesity should be covered in this state.”  The report is due to the legislature before January 1, 2007.  This resolution is currently on second reading in the House.

In Indiana, a physician must monitor a bariatric surgery patient for five years and file a report with the state.  Previous law stated that these reports were “public record.”  SB 266 would change that report from a “public record” to “confidential” and a recent amendment to the legislation includes the phrase “unless the physician is unable to locate the patient after making reasonable efforts.”  Unfortunately, the legislation does not define what constitutes a “reasonable effort.”

 

Arizona's Ballot Measure Put on Hold

Because Arizona’s constitution does not allow the state legislature to enact caps, Arizona’s medical community introduced SCR 1035 in 2005.  If the legislature declined to act on SCR 1035 in 2005, its sponsors would have the option of putting the issue on the November 2006 ballot.

Arizonans for Access to Health Care (AAHC), created by the Arizona Medical Association to focus on liability reform, has decided to postpone putting SCR 1035 on the November ballot.  A press release from the organization indicated that a recent poll showed that although the majority of Arizonans believe there is a health care crisis, they are unwilling to support significant reforms.  Nonetheless, AAHC may include this issue on the 2008 ballot. 

AAHC and the Arizona Medical Association are now focusing on other legislative reforms. One bill, SB 1351, would require the statutorily required elements of proof in a medical liability case to be established by clear and convincing evidence when related to specified emergency circumstances.  Even in the face of heavy opposition from the Trial Lawyers Association, the bill passed out of the health committee 5-1 (with one absent vote).

To read the entire press release regarding AAHC’s decision, go to: http://www.azmedassn.org/publications/stat/2006_0125.htm

Tennessee Joins the Growing List of States in Liability Crisis

Image: Medical Liability Reform Now or Pay Later
On February 14, the American Medical Association (AMA) officially designated Tennessee as a “crisis state.” Citing increases in liability premiums and their own 2004 data, the AMA noted that of Tennessee's 95 counties:
  • 81 counties have no residing neurosurgeon in patient care.
  • 49 counties have no residing orthopaedic surgeon in patient care.
  • 47 counties have no residing emergency physician in patient care.
  • 42 counties have no residing obstetrician-gynecologist in patient care.

The ACS Tennessee Chapter has joined 40 other organizations in a Medical Liability Reform (MLR) campaign to push for meaningful reforms.  To visit the campaign’s Web site, go to: http://www.mlrnow.org/.

 

 

Past Issues of ACS Cross Country:

2003
2004
2005
2006
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November/
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November/
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006

ACS State Affairs
Division of Advocacy and Health Policy
Jon H. Sutton
Manager, State Affairs
Chicago Headquarters
312-202-5358
jsutton@facs.org
Mindy Baker
State Affairs Associate
Chicago Headquarters
312-202-5363
mbaker@facs.org

Some of these files are in Adobe Acrobat format. To view Portable Document Files (PDF) download the free Adobe Acrobat Reader. Reminder: The Adobe Acrobat Reader ranges from 3.9 mb to 7.4 mb depending on the operating system your computer uses. Please allow for sufficient download time.

Revised March 2, 2006

Advocacy and Health Policy

 


This page and all contents are Copyright © 2003-2006
by the American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL 60611-3211